A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. On February 4, 2013, the Defendant loaned money to the victim C at the E agency office located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul. The Defendant would pay interest at 2.5% per month.

‘False speech' was made.

However, on February 2013, the Defendant had a total of KRW 158.9 million on the part of its members due to a loss from stock investment, and even if the Defendant continued to borrow money from the part of its members and continued to pay interest on the existing debt and manage the money in the form of “return prevention” in which the remaining money is continuously invested, the Defendant did not have any intent to normally change the money even if he did not receive money from the injured party, even though he did not have to continue to maintain the above method, inasmuch as he borrowed money from the injured party and did not have any ability to make a change.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above, received a total of KRW 59 million from February 4, 2013 to January 20, 2015 from January 20, 2015, from the victim to his agricultural bank account (F).

B. On August 2014, the Defendant wishes to have the victim C join the E agency office located in Boan-si D around 2014.

Around September 1, 2014, which is operated between 25 months and 25 months, the victim will enter the 6 foot 25th unit in front of the 25th unit. In June 15, 2015, the victim want to enter the 4th unit in front of 25th unit of 10 million won operated between 25 months and 25th unit of 25th unit of 10 million won.

“First of all, 14 old accounts (10 million won = 140 million won = approximately 140 million won) that typhers gold.

However, as seen in the above paragraph (a) above, it is the preceding account because there was a situation in which the so-called “return prohibition” in which interest on existing debts have been extended and interest on shares have been paid.