logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.01.20 2015구단13256
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 7, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that the injury and disease of this case occurred (hereinafter “the injury and disease of this case”) on October 7, 2014 due to work, while engaging in waste stiolization work for the Hannam industry (hereinafter “non-party company”) that is engaged in the synthetic resin manufacturing business, the Plaintiff applied for medical care benefits for the injury and disease of this case to the Defendant on January 23, 2015.

B. On March 2, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition to not approve an application for medical care on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the instant work branch and the instant work (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that “the instant injury and disease is confirmed, but is a serious change in equitable,” and that the cumulative burden on the duty is low due to the natural aggravation of the individual disease due to the low cumulative burden on the duty.

C. The plaintiff filed a request for reexamination, but was dismissed.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 3, 4 evidence, Eul 1 and 6 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The difference between the Plaintiff’s alleged sexual water flag (from March to November) and the non-scal water flag (from December to February) is high. The Plaintiff worked for a total of 20:00 to February 21:00 a day in the scal water season, and the Plaintiff was at the construction site to store and unload a waste scalma total number of 2:0 to 21:00 a day in the factory, and the Plaintiff was at the construction site to store and cut the waste scalma in the factory, to store waste scalma in the scalma in a narrow place, to remove the scale and to remove the anti-scale in a narrow place. The Plaintiff carried out the selection work at a large 1.4m height of 1.4 meters and carried out the selection work of removing the scalma from 10 to 30km.

On March 4, 2013, the Plaintiff was in violation of stipool as from March 4, 201, and was working on June 11, 2014.

arrow