1. With respect to the accidents described in attached Form 1. The plaintiff's successor to the defendant based on the insurance contract as shown in attached Form 2.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 7, 2005, the Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract in attached Form 2 with the Defendant with the insured as the Defendant (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

The main contents of the terms and conditions of the instant insurance contract are as shown in the attached Form 3. Insurance Terms and Conditions (hereinafter “instant terms and conditions”).

B. On March 19, 2013, at around 22:50, the Defendant was hospitalized in B Hospital, etc. until August 2013, 2013, and was hospitalized in B Hospital, etc., where the Defendant was able to inflict bodily injury on the blood species, etc. in the ductal of two ducts, the ductal of the ductal body, the ductal of the ductal body, and the ductal of the ductal body, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. On September 27, 2013, the Defendant was diagnosed by the doctor in charge of B Hospital as “over-the-counter dementia, the ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal

The Defendant claimed on October 1, 2013 that, due to the instant accident, the amount equivalent to 78% of the payment rate of the residual disability and the amount of the damage caused by dementia, the Defendant claimed on October 1, 2013 that the Plaintiff should pay the insurance proceeds of the harm inflicted on the part of the Defendant and the amount of the damage inflicted by at least

E. Accordingly, on November 19, 2013, the Plaintiff paid 210,000 won (10,000 won x 21%) to the Defendant on the following grounds: (a) recognition that the instant accident caused a subsequent disability falling under the limitation on dementia and daily basic action (a total of 21%) among the items of obstacles to new boundary and mental behavior (hereinafter “instant disability classification table”); and (b) recognition that the Plaintiff paid the Defendant KRW 210,00 (10,000,000,000 x 21%).

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 2, Eul Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11 (including virtual numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is based on the sum of the payment rates for obstacles to dementia and limitation on basic action for daily life resulting from the instant accident.