logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2019.01.30 2018고단2852
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, each of the above punishments shall be executed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants: (a) were to withstanding a used car (E) in D, a used car trading complex in Bupyeong-si, D; (b) were to contact with the customers by reporting false advertisements posted on the above commercial name-free website from the name-free persons belonging to the above commercial company; and (c) offered customers to purchase the sold goods posted on the above website or other vehicles (hereinafter above 1 vehicle) at a price that makes it impossible for them to sell them normally; and (d) received money in the form of transfer expenses, etc.; (b) there is a defect of the above vehicle; and (c) the customer gave up the purchase of the above vehicle and paid the money for the transfer expenses, and (d) there is a false attitude that the customer would be a defect of the above vehicle, and (e) there is no return of the money that the customer gave up the purchase of the above vehicle and paid for the transfer expenses, and there is a conspiracy to sell the vehicle and distribute the proceeds by selling it at a price lower than the average trading price.

1. Defendant B, on May 13, 2018, sold the victim F-related J J T-TT vehicle at KRW 9,700,000,00,000, when the victim F-W was posted to “I” from the telephone counsel staff belonging to the above company, at the “H” car trading complex located in Bupyeong-si, Bupyeong-si.

‘The fact that it was sent to the victim that it reported the advertisement and found it was sold to the victim at KRW 9,700,000,000,000,000,000 from the victim for the purpose of perusal of the said vehicle register.

After that, Defendant B recommended the victim to purchase at approximately KRW 5.6 million of the market price on the part of the victim by falsely stating that “The above spati vehicle has much more repair costs due to the fuel pumps, etc., and cannot drive on an expressway. The amount already entered due to relocation expenses, etc., cannot be refunded.” The Defendant A, who received contact, recommended the victim to purchase the K spati vehicle with approximately KRW 5.6 million of the market price, and the Defendant A, who received contact in advance.

arrow