A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a kitchen of a D cafeteria located in Kimhae-si C.

On May 18, 2018, at the above restaurant around 20:45 on May 2018, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) the wife of the Defendant, who worked in the above restaurant, first sees that he she would drink she; (c) the head of E would take the dangerous object on the table; (d) the head of E would take the dangerous object on the table, and (e) the head of E would take the dangerous object on the table; and (e) the head of E would have been on the part of E as a shoulderer’s disease; and (e) the head of E would have been on the part of E, a shoulderer’s disease.

F Af knife f knife one time.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous objects as above and inflicted bodily injury on the victim E, which requires medical treatment for about one week, and put the victim F on the left-hand chest in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and E;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including the part concerning the second, second, third, and F statements);

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each investigation report (on-site and suspect, accompanying photographs of victim victim side pictures, photographing victimF damage, telephone conversations with police officers in mobilization);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of small amount

1. The summary of the argument is that the Defendant was a shouldered fat disease, and there is no fat of the victim F's chest.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence revealed prior to the determination, the fact that the Defendant inflicted a bodily injury on the victim F on the victim F on one occasion by a shouldered snife can be recognized as stated in its reasoning.