beta
Text
1. The defendant shall take the procedure for registration of transfer of ownership on the motor vehicles listed in the separate sheet from C Co., Ltd.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. A. Around January 2014, the Defendant, between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, entered into a contract with the Plaintiff to remodel the instant motor vehicle listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant motor vehicle”) and deliver it to the Plaintiff by creating a camping car (hereinafter “instant camping car”). However, if the Defendant wishes, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Plaintiff to use the instant camping car at any time (hereinafter “instant contract”).
B. The Plaintiff’s 3,00,000 won on January 7, 2014 for the instant motor vehicle and camping car remodeling costs (hereinafter “instant camping car costs”), as the Defendant:
5.8.4,00,000 won was paid.
C. On March 10, 2014, the Plaintiff transferred the name of the instant automobile from the Defendant to C Co., Ltd., the representative director of which the Plaintiff was the Plaintiff, and concluded the automobile insurance contract with the Dolin Damage Insurance Co., Ltd. regarding the instant automobile between May 13, 2014 and May 13, 2015, with the insurance period from May 13, 2014, and paid KRW 1,120,740.
On March 17, 2014, the Plaintiff borrowed 13,000,000 won as security from Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. at an interest rate of 14.9% and paid it to the Defendant.
E. By June 2014, the Defendant completed approximately 80% to 90% of the instant camping operations, and thereafter, the Defendant was in a state of suspending the instant camping operations on the ground that the Plaintiff did not pay for the camping car.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 to 4, and purport of the whole pleadings
2. The Plaintiff asserted that the instant camping was set at KRW 25,00,000 at the time of entering into the instant contract with the Defendant, and that the instant camping was not completed until August 22, 2014, the filing date of the instant lawsuit, while the Plaintiff agreed to produce the instant camping car and deliver it to the Plaintiff within several months, and that the instant camping was not completed. Accordingly, the instant contract was revoked and its restoration was performed on the grounds of the Defendant’s nonperformance of obligation.