logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.06.24 2014가단44359
세대별 금1천만원의 재산 감가 손해액
Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim is all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the parties, etc.) When the plaintiff and the appointed parties (hereinafter referred to as “the plaintiff, etc.”) are displayed together, "the plaintiff, etc."

2) The apartment houses in the JJ of Daegu Northern-gu are multi-household houses (hereinafter referred to as “multi-household houses in this case”).

Each of the owners is the owners who have completed the registration of ownership transfer after having been sold in lots. The Plaintiff and the selectors C, D, and E are the sole owners of each of the following subparagraphs, and the co-owners of the following 1/2 shares. 2) The Defendant is a person who constructed and sold the instant multi-household housing.

K was in charge of selling multi-household housing in this case as the defendant's birth.

B. 1) The Defendant is Young-do Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Decree-do”) around July 2013, 2013

) From the Daegu Northern-gu L Site, part of the site of the instant multi-household housing among the instant multi-household housing sites was divided into 861 square meters in Daegu North-gu MU-gu MU (Seoul-gu L)

(2) On December 2, 2013, the Defendant purchased the instant multi-household house and completed the registration of division on September 2, 2013. (2) On December 2, 2013, the Defendant commenced the instant multi-household house and obtained the approval for its use on May 2, 2014.

The details of the sale price of housing units (won) No. 1 C 202 on April 12, 2014, 160,000,002D 3030,002 D 165,000 on May 17, 2014, and 165,000,000,000 between G and one other and one other on May 305, 2014, May 20, 2014, Plaintiff A500, May 163, 200,00, 5 E 602, 602, and 603,00,000 (hereinafter the same shall apply to the instant case’s multi-household housing site, the current status of the neighboring multi-household housing site of the Plaintiff as of May 21, 2014 and the neighboring multi-household housing site of this case (hereinafter the same shall apply).

(i) the construction is continuing in the area of the building project. [The basis for recognition] The absence of dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including paper numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply)

No. 4, No. 11 to 14, each entry of No. 4, No. 11 to 14, each inquiry reply to the head of the North Korean Office in Daegu Metropolitan City in this Court, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion.

arrow