A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

D (J) The prosecution of detention on June 24, 2016) is a person who has obtained E apartment buildings in a deep-scale (public relations) in China, and has established an office of the telephone financial fraud call center at this place, and has operated a general management of the telephone financial fraud organization by comprehensively managing the lending fraud organization, such as managing the lending fraud staff, such as the telecomer and the telecommunications fraud incentive, and the collection of money obtained from victims.

F is a Chinese office manager who makes the telephone inducement manual, etc. and educates the telemers in the above apartment to cope with or deceptions following the victims' various reactions, manages and supervises the team leader and the telemers, and distributes the money acquired by fraud to the lighting staff at a certain ratio.

G and H are the team leader who performs the role of calculating allowances according to loan fraud performance and reporting it to the manager according to the results of the management of the telemers and paying allowances to the telemers.

The Defendant and I, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, etc. are provided with urbanes by deceiving a person who reported a loan text message to make a loan by misrepresenting him/her with a third party.

Around April 28, 2014, the Defendant, in collusion with D, F, G, H, etc. in order to the effect that “a loan is made with a mobile communications company” was false to the victim S who called the text message, and “a loan will be made if the Defendant sent the core chip after removing the core chip through a new opening of the mobile phone.”

However, the fact is that the defendant et al. was not a styp capital employee and there was no intention or ability to provide loans to the victim even if he/she received a cell phone from the victim.

The defendant, in collusion with the above D, deceiving the victim as such, and received one cell phone unit of gal lusium 86,800 won at the market price on the same day from the victim.