1. On March 28, 2012, the Defendant against the Plaintiff, among the additional injury and disease approval dispositions rendered against the Plaintiff, against each party.

1. Details of the instant disposition

A. On September 13, 2010, the Plaintiff was employed as a daily worker belonging to B Co., Ltd., at the construction site of the Geumcheon-gu Busan Metropolitan City and cut the pipes to the large sewage pipe at the site of the construction site on September 13, 2010, due to an electric shock accident that occurred while the sewage pipe was cut off due to an industrial electric dryle and cut off the pipes.

(hereinafter “instant disaster”). B.

The Plaintiff suffered from the instant accident (hereinafter referred to as “the first injury and injury”), and was under medical care until August 31, 201, with the Defendant’s approval for medical care, due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered from the “continct salt in the both sides, the right-hand salt, the erode, the electric shock damage, and the second injury in the both sides (hereinafter referred to as “the second injury”).

C. After that, on January 16, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional injury with the Defendant on the following grounds: (a) on the instant disaster: (b) the Defendant applied for the instant additional injury by changing the name of the disease of the superior to both sides on March 28, 2012, to both sides of the Plaintiff on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the instant accident; and (c) the remainder of the additional injury is not recognized (hereinafter “instant disposition”). D. D. The Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the non-approval decision on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the instant accident.

The Plaintiff filed a petition for review with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee on May 31, 2012 regarding the instant disposition, but the petition for review was dismissed on May 31, 2012, and the petition for review was also dismissed on August 24, 2012.

【Uncontentious facts, Gap’s evidence 1, 2, Eul’s evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the instant disposition

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff suffered additional injury due to the chronic damage of the land caused by the disaster of this case, and thus, there is a proximate causal relation between the additional wound of this case and the disaster of this case.