beta
Text
A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for three months and by imprisonment for six months for two crimes as stated in the judgment of the defendant, respectively.
Reasons
Criminal facts
On April 21, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court on April 21, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 29, 2017.
1. The Defendant and C, on October 20, 2017, attempted to enter the above e-art club along with his e-sports on the alley side of the E-art club located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan on October 20, 2017. However, on the ground that the entrance appears to have lower the age at the entrance, the Defendant and C were subject to a restraint on the employees.
Accordingly, C is an employee of the Victim F, who is an employee who stuffed with garbage bars in a marina club ( South, 21 years old), who "I live 21 years in inside and outside of the club, why entry is not made."
The Defendant 1 flicked flicked flicked flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick fl, and flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick of flick flick flick flick fl, and flick flick flick flfl
Accordingly, the defendant committed violence against victims jointly with C.
2. Criminal facts in the case 2018 highest 126 cases.
A. On March 20, 2017, at a place where Daegu could not be known, the Defendant: (a) returned from the Victim H (Nam, 16 years old); (b) “I’s Oral Seaba; (c) but I demanded at its repair cost KRW 1.8 million.
Upon the request of I to the effect that the repair cost may not be paid to I, the victim and I agreed on the repair cost to be paid to I by the victim and I.
Since then, the defendant has 1 million won the money to be given to the victim as the repair cost, etc. of the victim.
A false statement was made to the effect that “I will substitute for KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000 to be paid to I.”
However, there was no repair cost, etc. that the defendant has to receive from I.
Defendant 2.