1. The Defendant’s disposition of non-permission to construct a building permit (new construction) against the Plaintiff on March 15, 2017 is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Details of the disposition

On March 7, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for a building permit (hereinafter “instant application”) with the Defendant to newly build two facilities related to the same and plant of the total floor space of 4,183m24m2 and one attached building on the ground of the 5,243m3m2 (hereinafter “instant application site”).

- A nearby the site where a construction permit application is filed, C has made a lot of contribution to the revitalization of the regional economy as one of the major tourist resorts of our city where more than 150,000 visitors find that 3.95 billion won is 3.95 billion won and local expenses, c. vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable and vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetables.

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case’s disposition”). [Grounds for recognition] A] without dispute, each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the overall purport of the pleading, and the validity of the disposition in this case’s whole purport, the Plaintiff’s application in this case’s assertion as to whether the disposition in this case is legitimate does not constitute an area subject to restriction on livestock raising as prescribed by the relevant statutes, and it cannot be readily concluded that the Defendant’s disposition in this case’s application in this case’s refusal is necessary for public interest.