Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On September 29, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a period of six months of imprisonment for fraud in this court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 7, 2016.

[2] The Defendant, at around May 4, 2016, connected to the “CPC room” located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, to the Internet integrated portal site, and sold “Twitet” on the sales bulletin board.

If 150,000 won is remitted to the victim D who reported and contacted the content of “”

5.8. He/she will send one head of his/her contact book to his/her home-based arrangements.

“A false representation was made.”

However, due to the fact that the defendant did not have E-et diskettes, even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the ticket.

On May 5, 2016, the Defendant was transferred KRW 150,000 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (F) in the name of the Defendant, under the name of the Defendant, from the victim.

From May 12, 2016, the Defendant received a total of 630,000 won from the victims to the said Agricultural Cooperative account under the name of the Defendant, as shown in the list of crimes attached hereto, from the victims four times in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the police on June 22, 2016 against the defendant;

1. Each written statement of G, H, D, and I, G, H, D, and I;

1. Transfer certificate, a statement of account transactions, a statement of account conversation, a statement of transaction, a statement of transaction, a statement of transfer, a statement of transfer, a statement of transaction, a statement of transaction in the Stockholm, and a statement of account transaction (A);

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: One copy of the inquiry of summary information of the case No. 2016 Highest of the Ulsan District Court 2017 and one copy of the judgment of the case No. 2117 Highest of the Ulsan District Court 2016 Highest of 2016;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;