Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On May 20, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Sungnam Branch of Suwon District Court on May 20, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 25, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

On February 12, 2015, from around 13:24 to 18:47, the Defendant visited the Defendant as a guest at the PC “D” room operated by the victim C located in Suwon-si B and the third floor in Suwon-si.

Even if the defendant uses the PC from the beginning, he did not have any intention or ability to pay the price.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and using the PC at the seat 12 times in the above bank, was provided by the victim, and did not pay 8,200 won, thereby taking property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. The PC and game contents used by a suspect;

1. CCTV photographs;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: Application of the accused's legal statement, a copy of the judgment (U.S. District Court's Sungnam Branch Court's 2015 High Court's 189, 2659 (Joinder

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a defendant with reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) shall partially reduce the amount of fine determined by the summary order by taking into account the circumstances unfavorable to him/her, the fact that he/she has been punished for committing a crime of the same kind of law, the fact that he/she has recognized his/her mistake, the fact that the amount of damage is relatively minor, the fact that he/she has been punished for a crime of ex post facto concurrent crimes, the equity in the