A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

Punishment of the crime

On February 13, 2014, the Defendant submitted a written complaint to C to the subcommittee police station.

The contents of the complaint are as follows: although the owner of a building recorded in the D building ledger in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan City was the wife of the defendant, the above building ledger was falsely prepared on December 3, 1997 by the F, G, the owner “H”, the lot number of “H”, and “J” by Sungnam-si I, and the defendant C, as seen above, was the owner of a building falsely prepared in the building ledger in I and J building register, deceiving the person responsible for compensation for the event at the time of the creation of a housing site creation project in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, the Sungnam-si, and obtained from Sungnam-si, the compensation for the relocation of the housing site to be compensated by the defendant or E, the defendant C, who was the defendant, was the owner of a building.

However, in fact, the Defendant purchased a building constructed in the J river site in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si (where located in D on April 20, 1995) on or around April 20, 195, but the said building was removed by Sungnam-si on or around June 1995 on the ground that it was an illegal building constructed in the river site, and thus did not meet the compensation requirements in the process of examining the person subject to relocation measures. The above H-owned building (32.83 square meters) was a separate building from the above E-owned building, and its lot number was originally D, and the building did not meet the above compensation requirements, regardless of the application for change of entries in H’s building register, and thus, it did not meet the above compensation requirements, regardless of whether it was owned by H on or around December 3, 1997.