A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The evidence seized by the defendant shall be confiscated as provided for in subparagraphs 1 through 18.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, B, and the employee engaged in the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of

A. On October 25, 2018, the victim C’s name and non-scam scam scam scam scam scaming the investigator belonging to the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office by phoneing the victim C at an unscam site, and misrepresenting the investigator of the Seoul Central Public Prosecutor’s Office. “Inasmuch as the account in the name of C was stolen for an offense, any money deposited into another financial account in the name of the party is suspected of being illegal, and thus our employee of the Financial Supervisory Service

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

On October 25, 2018, the Defendant misrepresented the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service at E located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul on October 15, 2018, according to the direction of the phishing staff, and received 40 million won from the damaged person’s financial account in the aforementioned false manner.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property from the injured party by deceiving the injured party in collusion with his nameless person.

B. On October 26, 2018, the victim F’s name and incompeting employee called the victim F to the victim F at a closed place, and misrepresenting the investigator belonging to the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office. “As FC’s account was stolen for an offense, the money deposited into another financial account under the name of FC is suspected of being illegal, and thus our employee of the Financial Supervisory Service sent by us is also charged to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service.