logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.04.12 2017가단226220
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From May 1, 2014 to June 19, 2017, the Plaintiff operated the skin management room under the trade name “E” in the Seo-gu Daejeon Daejeon Building D.

B. The Defendant, with the trade name of “F” (hereinafter referred to as “instant product”), manufactures finished products or parts by entrusting the manufacture of a finished product to the manufacturing company, and sells them to the Defendant’s brand “H.” H or I. The Defendant indicated “F Sheeting” as the manufacturer’s trade name, and indicated “F 1” as the Defendant’s trade name on the back of the container, and indicated “F 1” as a manufacturer-seller, from around 0 on June 19, 2014 to around 2000, to KRW 15,000 on the face of the instant product that was posted at online sales. The Plaintiff purchased the instant product from around 200 to around 15, 200 to KRW 15,00,000.

E. The J filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for compensation of damages around July 2016, when side effects, such as coloring, such as face and front chests, etc. during the implementation of the above Laling, and filed a complaint against the Plaintiff in violation of the Special Act on the Control of Public Health Crimes and injury caused by occupational negligence, etc. around November of the same year.

F. On October 26, 2017, the Plaintiff was prosecuted on the charge of the above accusation and intended on October 26.

arrow