1. The plaintiffs' lawsuit against defendant K is dismissed.

2. The plaintiffs' claims against defendant I and J are dismissed, respectively.

3...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 18, 201, the Plaintiff 1, B, C, L, and M (Plaintiff D was inherited by consultation and division on October 18, 201), N, andO (F inherited its co-ownership from O on May 10, 201, sold it to P on May 2, 2008; P sold it to Plaintiff H on December 7, 2009; QR’s co-ownership on June 24, 2002, sold the said co-ownership share to S on August 20, 200, and sold it to G 1/2 of the said aggregate co-ownership on the instant land (hereinafter “Plaintiff 2, 207,” and the Plaintiff 1/2 of the said aggregate co-ownership shares on August 20, 202, and sold it to G 1, 207, respectively, as the Plaintiff’s co-ownership share on the instant land (hereinafter “Plaintiff 2, 2008”).

B. The said 12 owners entered into a contract for construction works with the Seoul Construction Co., Ltd. on February 24, 2000, and each of the above reconstruction projects with the traffic integrated construction Co., Ltd. on May 25, 2001, but the said contract was entirely rescinded.

C. On November 2, 2004, the Plaintiff A, B, F, G, E, C, Nonparty V, L, M, S, and N (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”) entered into a contract with AC to pay the construction cost of the instant newly built construction as the substitute for the 6th generation of apartments, the first floor household, and the instant commercial building.

Plaintiff

The extent of 90% of the commercial building of this case is completed.