Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A was a teacher of K High School in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, and was in charge of Korean language writing as of July 2009.

On July 15, 2009, the Defendant’s office at the above K high school entrance, and from B, who is in charge of the principal office at the same school teacher at the above K high school, it is difficult for the Defendant to put the two grades in the subjects of Korean Language, and to enter the Seoul High School.

Neither the principal nor the principal created a class 1.

If the criteria for evaluation are to be changed, the words "to be treated so," and the evaluation criteria for the subjects of Korean language were changed retroactively, thereby raising L's grade 1 by means of raising L's grade.

Around that time, the Defendant prepared a record of consultation on Korean language and subjects in the above K High School Department, and changed the “(i) - cate examinations - (ii) - interim examinations - (iii) performance evaluation” into “(i) interim examinations - (ii) oral examinations - (iii) performance evaluation,” and written the date and time of consultation retroactively on April 17, 2009, and signed or sealed by Korean language teachers who are aware of such circumstances.

The Defendant obtained the same points at the total point of the first semester of the subject of Korean language by retroactively changing the standard of braille processing of the same subject of Korean language as above, but arbitrarily changed the grade of L who received the second class by the existing standard of braille processing, and arbitrarily changed the grade of M who received the first class by the existing standard of braille processing to the second class, thereby interfering with the affairs of sexual treatment of K High School by deceptive means.

2. The Defendant: (a) around July 15, 2009, at the above K high school entrance office, the Defendant: (b) had A, the principal subject of Korean language writing, revised the criteria for assessment of Korean language writing subjects; and (c) had A, the principal subject of Korean language writing subject retroactively applied them; and (d) instigated the Defendant to interfere with the affairs of sexual treatment of K High School.

Summary of Evidence

0 Defendant A

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The witness N,O, P, Q, R and S’s legal statement.