logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.12.12 2013노3342
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds of appeal (two years of the suspended sentence of imprisonment for October, confiscation, and defendant B: one year of suspended sentence of imprisonment for April, confiscation, defendant C: one year of suspended sentence of imprisonment for April, one year of suspended sentence of imprisonment for April, and one year of suspended sentence of imprisonment for defendant D: one year of suspended sentence of imprisonment for April, and one year of suspended sentence of imprisonment for

2. The crime of this case, which was committed by the defendants, is limited to the case where the defendant Eul provided a game product with contents different from those classified to many customers and exchanged the result, and the size of the game room (40 game machine) is not significant, but the defendants recognized his mistake and reflect it (the defendant Eul denied the crime at the court below but declared that it would be against the judgment of the court without filing an appeal). The defendant Eul has no specific history of crime (including one time suspension of execution of sentence). The defendant Eul has no specific history of crime, and the defendant Eul has no history of fine only one time, the period of business of the game room is not long, the defendant Eul temporarily exchanged in the game room upon request of the defendant Eul, and the defendant Eul and D do not appear to have been involved in the crime of this case, taking into account the following circumstances: the defendant Eul's participation in the crime of this case and the contents of the crime of this case's employment and character, the defendant Eul's age of participation in the crime of this case, and the circumstances and circumstances of the defendant Eul's employment.

3. In conclusion, since the prosecutor's appeal against the Defendants is without merit, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow