1. The Defendant’s KRW 15 million and the Plaintiff’s annual interest from March 28, 2017 to August 18, 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is a legally married couple who completed the marriage report on February 7, 1994, and has three children under the chain.

B. Around November 2014, the Defendant met at an elementary school alumni meeting with C and C, and the Defendant, despite being aware of the fact that he/she was a woman, maintained an inappropriate relationship, including the content suggesting sexual intercourse, by giving frequent contact by message or e-mail until March 2017.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements in Gap's 1 to 3, 5, and 6 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. A. 1) A third party’s liability for damages shall not interfere with a married couple’s community life falling under the essence of marriage by intervening in a married couple’s community life. A third party’s act of infringing on or maintaining a married couple’s community life falling under the essence of marriage by committing an unlawful act with the married couple and infringing on the spouse’s right as the spouse, thereby causing emotional distress to the spouse (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 201Meu2997, Nov. 20, 2014). In this case, “unlawful act” refers to a broad concept that includes adultery, but does not reach the adultery, but it includes any unlawful act that does not comply with the husband’s duty of good faith. Whether it is an unlawful act shall be evaluated in consideration of the degree and circumstances depending on the specific case (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 8Meu7, May 24, 198; 8Meu28, Nov. 10, 1992; 206Da3268, etc.).