(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.05.13 2014고정1559

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.05.13 2014고정1559

폭행

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Part of the facts charged shall be revised and supplemented without going through amendments to indictment to the extent that it seems that there is no concern about substantial disadvantage to the defendant's defense right.

On April 20, 2014, around 04:50 on April 20, 2014, the Defendant has been playing together at the stage of the first floor D underground in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, E and Si expenses.

Each other is enclosed.

At that time, the victim F, the main employee, was removed from the defendant and E, and was listed on the first floor through stairs.

While the Defendant was going into the above stairs, the Defendant assaulted the victim by taking the victim's head knee and making knee kne.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made in F in the third protocol of the trial;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged photographs (E);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no assault against the victim as stated in the judgment of the defendant and his defense counsel regarding the assertion of the provisional payment order under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no assault against the victim, but the method of assault from the investigative agency to this court, the contents of the victim's statement on the side, and G at the time, which had been the defendant's work, stated in this court that "the victim took the defendant from E to the stairs in order to remove the defendant (the statement in G in the fifth trial record)," and other facts such as the situation where the victim took the defendant's back and taken the stairs after drinking alcohol, and the situation that the victim seems to have been stimulatedd after drinking and drinking alcohol, the defendant and his defense counsel's above assertion cannot be accepted.

참조조문

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 포항지원 2015.04.23 2014고단1292

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.08.09 2017고정564

-의정부지방법원 2013.05.30 2012고정367

-부산지방법원 2013.06.13 2012고정4586

-서울동부지방법원 2019.10.18 2018고정902