Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a facility management employee of B apartment management office at the time of public housing, and the victim C (the name, female, and the age of 20) is a person who resides in the above apartment subparagraph d.

On December 18, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 14:00 on December 18, 2019, at the instant apartment house D’s dwelling room located in the victim; (b) had the victim’s shouldered in the process of replacing the said apartment complex; (c) had the victim’s shouldered, “picked, bad, and bad; (d) he thought that he is likely to have his husband and wife; and (e) had the victim’s body in two arms; and (e) had the victim drawn up more time while performing the work of replacing the said container, and had the victim forcedly committed an indecent act against the victim by forcing the victim to wear up to the view of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. 112 reported case handling table;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes committed;

1. Article 47(1) and Article 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from an order to disclose and notify information, the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, the proviso to Article 56(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, the proviso to Article 59-3(1) of the Act on Welfare of Disabled Persons, and the proviso to Article 59-3(1) of the Act on Welfare of Disabled Persons, the fact that the completion of a sexual assault treatment program against the Defendant appears to have the effect of preventing recidivism by the Defendant. In addition, the Defendant’s age, family environment, social relationship, risk of repeating the crime in this case, the details and circumstance of the