The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (2 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is the confession and reflect of the defendant, the fact that the defendant does not have the same power, the defendant operated a relatively small scale livestock shed, the defendant sold the lawsuit after the crime of this case, and discontinued the livestock industry to lower risk of re-offending, and the defendant supports the mother at class 3 with a physical disability, although it is acknowledged that the period of discharge of livestock excreta in the neighboring river is short, the defendant does not have a large amount of transfer, and the defendant has a large amount of transfer discharged, and the amount of fine in the summary order is deemed to have been reduced considering the favorable circumstances as seen above at the court below. In full view of all the circumstances such as sentencing precedents in similar cases, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.