The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

judgment of the first instance.

The reason why our court's explanation about this case is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Plaintiff asserts that E, F, G, and H had at the Child Center in this case until the Plaintiff asserts, the instant disposition is unlawful as the grounds for disposition did not exist, and that the Plaintiff is obligated to return only the amount deducted from the subsidies. First, as to the assertion that there is no grounds for disposition in this case, the Plaintiff’s ground for disposition in this case, including Gap evidence No. 13, Gap evidence No. 14-1, No. 14-2, No. 15, and No. 16, and all of the Plaintiff’s evidence, including evidence No. 14-1, No. 15, and No. 16, are insufficient to reverse the fact-finding and determination of the first instance court, and there is no counter-proof. Rather, in the appellate court of the relevant criminal case (Seoul District Court Decision 2014No120, No. 2015No521, Aug. 25, 2016, the Plaintiff’s appeal that the Plaintiff received the subsidy in this case’s total amount should not be dismissed.