The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant, although he did not extract the skin by using sulphical equipment on the parts such as D, etc., he was guilty of the facts charged in this case, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., the police and the court of the court below, i.e., D stated in the police and the court of the court below that the defendant extracted the defendant by using a yellow machine on his own side, etc., and ii) the motive and circumstance of the defendant to undergo the procedure are deemed to have high credibility, it can be sufficiently recognized, and therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.