Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim C(26 years of age) worked as an assistant nurse at the "E Hospital" located in the Busan Seo-gu D.

At around 15:00 on November 27, 2013, the Defendant, within the third floor toilet of the instant E Hospital, had a crypted for the victim who recklessly flaps, but the victim was in need of cleaning the operation room, and the victim who was inflading the Defendant, who was inflading the victim, “p refers to why he would flab be dumbly humbly hump?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h??h?h?h?h??h?h?h??h?h?h??h?h?h??h?h?h?h?h??h?h?h?h?h?h?h?

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. The fact-finding reply sheet;

1. A medical certificate of injury attached to a report on investigation (Attachment of a medical certificate);

1. Photographs;

1. CCTV images;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes attached to the investigation report (CCTV attachment);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the defense counsel's assertion under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, the defense counsel asserts that the defendant's head was taken to defend the victim's assault against the victim at the time and constitutes self-defense or legitimate act. Thus, in full view of the evidence of this case, the evidence of this case can only be confirmed as stated in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment of the defendant, and the fact that the victim committed an assault against the defendant is not verified, and no evidence exists that can be recognized as legitimate act or self-defense as alleged by the defense counsel. Thus, the above defense counsel'