1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows: ① the part of the 11th to 12th two of the 13th 12th 12th son of the judgment of the first instance (at the same time, there is no evidence of omission from Gap evidence 9-1, 2nd ; ② the judgment on the plaintiffs' priority in the trial is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition as described in paragraph 2. Thus, it can be accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. (b) According to each of the 3th 1st son portion, the appointment of the president can not be seen as having been lawfully approved from the president of the AI, in light of the legislative intent of Article 54-3(3) proviso of the Private School Act, since the plaintiff H was notified of the unlawful grounds for appointment of the principal from the defendant, and then the appointment of the principal of the principal of the plaintiff can not be seen as having been duly approved from the principal of 16th 2.

In addition, on December 8, 2010, Plaintiff B applied for the appointment of the principal, but was rejected by the Defendant on the ground that he applied for the appointment of the principal retroactively from the initial date of the appointment of the principal (Evidence A 31), and Plaintiff D obtained the appointment of the principal from the Defendant on December 21, 2010, but the appointment period is from December 21, 2010 to February 29, 2012 (Evidence A 34), and Plaintiff H also obtained the appointment approval of the principal from the Defendant on December 16, 2010, but the appointment period is from December 16, 2010 to October 1, 2012.