logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2015.07.09 2015고단30
위증
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On September 30, 2014, the Defendant is only the case of violation of the Public Official Election Act against the Cheongju District Court Decision 2014Ra222 E and F, which was located in Young-dong, Young-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Cheongju District Court No. 201, the above court’s 2014Ra222 E and F.

After attending and taking an oath as a witness, the witness testified to the prosecutor’s examination that “it is true that he has delivered a plastic bag to the village instead of Defendant E,” and the witness testified to the counsel’s examination that “I know that he is this head, and there is no fact that there is any objection to this Chapter”.

However, on December 25, 2013 and April 1, 2014, the Defendant sent money bags by changing the G Leecheon-gun from E to E in the local election on two occasions.

Ultimately, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. The Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion did not transfer money bags to Ha or H twice on or around December 25, 2013 and around April 1, 2014.

Therefore, the defendant's testimony stated in the facts charged is not a false statement, and the defendant did not give a perjury.

3. Determination

A. The facts charged in the instant case are premised on the fact that the Defendant, on December 25, 2013, and April 1, 2014, the head of the office G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G in the course of a regional election, different from E, and delivered money bags to H. As such, the issue of the instant case is whether such facts are recognized.

B. The Defendant stated that he was given money bags twice in relation to his election even when he was subject to the disposition of a fine for negligence. As seen below, the monetary content between the Defendant and H exists, which corresponds to the H’s statement, and the Defendant was living for a period of four months after giving testimony as stated in the facts charged, until being arrested on February 27, 2015.

arrow