logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2018.06.21 2018고합6
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(위계등간음)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for five years, and for three years and six months, respectively.

The seized 50,000 won shall be 6,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Joint crimes committed by Defendant A and Defendant B

A. On October 16, 2017, the Defendants were willing to return to a house located in the department of Gyeonggi-do (the age of 18) of the victim I (the age of 18) who was known through H, a residence of the Defendant B located in the Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul, through around 11:00 on October 16, 2017, to the victim I (the age of 18) who had been aware of the said house through H, which is around 11:00 on October 16, 2017.

The defendant B may pay a certain amount of money to the victim by calculating the amount to be calculated on a daily basis, stating that it may exceed KRW 00,000 per month, and the defendant B may pay a lot of money.

The method of engaging in sexual traffic is also known to the extent that it is possible to find out how to engage in sexual traffic.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to attract the victims of children and juveniles to become the counterpart to the act of buying sex.

B. The Defendants were forced to violate the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (in the event of coercion, etc.) and forced to engage in sexual traffic on October 2017, that the victim would no longer engage in sexual traffic in the above G 105 to a police officer on October 2017.

Defendant A shows a fluorous appearance, and “A fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort fluort flu

Defendant B appears to have an attitude of posing the risk of refusing to engage in sexual traffic by referring to “”, Defendant B’s surveillance to prevent the victim from escaping from outside, and Defendant B’s participation in his house at the same place as a policeman on November 2017.

Defendant B bears charge of the money which he had at any time.

Then, Defendant A has written and written a letter as the same because he/she did not know the money.

Now we can do so.

Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz.

“I, as if you write a letter, you do not send the victim,” and “I, as you do not send the victim, have the victim drinked,” and “I, on October 16, 2017.

arrow