logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.12.07 2017누74483
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation concerning this case is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

[3] The court of first instance held that even if the plaintiff's motion picture was considered together with the moving type disc (USB) submitted after the closing of argument, it is hard to view that the plaintiff's motion was a well-founded fear from the government that he/she was engaged in his/her activities under the Korean National Council (SCNC) that he/she was able to be boomed by the Korean Government that he/she was able to be boomed by the Korean National Council (SCNC) that he/she was able to be boomed by the Korean Republic of Korea. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance held that the plaintiff's motion is legitimate, and therefore,

arrow