Defendant

A Fine of KRW 4 million, Defendant B Co., Ltd. is fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant C Co., Ltd. is fine of KRW 3 million.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is the representative of the'B (State)' and the'C (State)' of the waste collection and transportation business chain, which are the intermediate waste treatment business entity in the wife population E, in Permitted-si.

According to Article 18 (1) of the Wastes Control Act, an industrial waste discharger shall dispose of wastes discharged from his/her place of business by himself/herself or entrust the disposal thereof to a legitimate business entity. According to Article 25 (3) of the same Act, a person who intends to operate a waste disposal business shall have facilities, equipment, and technical capacity meeting the standards prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Environment and obtain permission from the Mayor/Do Governor for each type of business. A person who has completed installation of waste disposal facilities pursuant to Article 30

A. The Defendant, as an intermediate disposal company of food waste, did not entrust the disposal of commercial waste (ve plant residues) generated in the course of interim disposal to the permitting company from December 20, 2010 to December 29, 201, and disposed of illegally 261 ton of the daily waste (land category- field, answer, farmland G) in the farmland (land category-based) located in the Chungcheongnam-gun Group F, Chungcheongnam-gun;

(b) The defendant, who does not permit the collection and transportation of industrial wastes in the course of transporting industrial wastes, was collected and transported by using a C (H and I) vehicle representing him/her;

(c) In addition, the Defendant installed a by-product fertilizer production facility (e.g., enzyunching machine, fermentation facility, subsequent lodging facility, vibration screening machine) to add by-product fertilizer production facilities among the permitted matters for interim waste disposal business, and received facility conformity assessment from the inspection institution on June 30, 2010, but was subject to a conformity assessment before receiving the facility assessment.

6. up to 23. A facility operation produced by-products fertilizers for any purpose other than the purpose of facility inspection and discharged 610 tons of by-products to members of farmland located in Ansan area, Gangwon-do, for the purpose of facility inspection.

2. Defendant B.