A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

While the Defendant operated ‘B' C B from February 2018 on the basis of the professional knowledge or dynamic knowledge that he/she opened in Germany, he/she became aware of each other after he/she became aware of the fact that the victim D, who was infinite due to divorce, requested the Defendant to provide a letter of apology counseling on March 27, 2018, due to the victim D, who was infinite due to the problem of divorce, was infinited, and was infinite, and was infinite, who was infinite, and was infinite, and was infinite, who was infinite, was infinite, and was infinite, who was infinite.

When the Defendant got trust by gaining access to the victim by making a softener, etc., the Defendant intending to help the victim recover once again, and to make all the days clear, while soliciting the instrument to acquire the money of the victim for the purpose of money fraud.

On April 27, 2018, the Defendant called “H” restaurant operated by the Defendant in Chungcheongnam-gu G in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, that “The Defendant Dop intended to create her husband and change her husband’s name,” and that “the Defendant shall purchase her uniforms and hings, and transfer money due to other incidental expenses.”

However, even if the defendant did not have the ability to change the street scarcity by causing the victim's spouse again, and even if he received money from the victim, he was thought to use it as the defendant's restaurant operation expenses, such as investment in stocks or overseas futures trading unrelated to the scarcity expense, or the defendant's restaurant operation expenses in the operation of the enemy.

On April 27, 2018, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 3,333,333 from the national bank account (I) in the name of the Defendant, from the victim, and received KRW 36,795,909 in total from that time until October 31 of the same year, as shown in the list of crimes in attached Table, from that time.

Summary of Evidence

1..