1. The Plaintiff’s appeal against Defendant B and Defendant C are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be individually counted.

1. The scope of the trial of this court is that the plaintiff claimed KRW 20 million against the conjunctive defendant C and accepted KRW 17 million among them, and that the remaining claims against the defendant C and the claims against the primary defendant church are dismissed, and it is evident in the record that only the defendant C have filed each appeal against the primary defendant, and only the plaintiff has filed only the primary defendant with respect to the claim against the primary defendant. Thus, the part of the claim against the primary defendant and only the claim against the primary defendant are subject to the trial of this court. Thus, the decision is made only on this issue.

2. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows: "Defendant C" of Part III of the first instance court's decision in the part of the third instance court's decision in the part of the third instance court's decision in the part of the third instance court's "A" shall be added to "A" in the part of the third instance court's decision in the part of the third instance court's decision, and then "A" shall be added to "the ground for recognition" in the part of the third instance 12, and "the defendant church recorded the name" in the 5th 10th 10th 10,000 won in the part of the second instance court's decision in the part of the second instance court's decision in the part of the 7th 5th 7th 7th 7 , "the defendant C shall have the former lessee report the resumption of the child-care center's name as part of the change in the name of the representative of the child-care center, and the part of the court's decision shall be changed to 25 million won in the name of the first instance.

3. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment at the court of the trial are the defendant, who is the representative of the defendant church.