logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2008. 01. 08. 선고 2007구단9771 판결
제소기간 도과한 소제기의 적법 여부[국승]
Title

Whether a lawsuit with excessive time limit is lawful

Summary

The above objection filed after the lapse of 90 days from the date of receiving the notice of the disposition of this case is unlawful. Ultimately, the lawsuit of this case is unlawful as it does not go through legitimate procedures for a prior trial.

Related statutes

Article 61 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Text

The instant lawsuit is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim

The Defendant’s disposition of imposition of KRW 100,256,590 on October 1, 2003 against the Plaintiff shall be revoked.

Reasons

ex officio, we examine the legitimacy of the instant lawsuit.

According to Eul 4 and 5, the defendant issued a disposition imposing capital gains tax stated in the purport of the claim to the plaintiff on October 1, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as "disposition in this case"). On December 22, 2006, the plaintiff filed an objection against the defendant on December 22, 2006, and filed a request for examination on March 23, 2007 with the Commissioner of the National Tax Service on March 23, 2007, but the above request for examination was also dismissed on May 7, 2007, and it is evident that the plaintiff filed the lawsuit in this case on August 6, 2007.

In the event that a taxpayer files a lawsuit seeking cancellation of the disposition of national taxes such as income tax, etc., the filing of the lawsuit shall be filed within 90 days from the date (if a notice of disposition is received, the date of its receipt) on which the relevant disposition is known (Article 66(6), Article 61(1) of the Framework Act on National Taxes), Article 61(4), and Article 61(5) of the Framework Act on National Taxes can be acknowledged as having received the notice of the disposition of this case from the defendant during the period from October 1, 2003 to October 16, 2003. Thus, the above filing of the lawsuit on December 22, 2006, which is 90 days after the lapse of 90 days, is illegal, and the lawsuit of this case is unlawful as it does not go through legitimate procedures

Therefore, the instant lawsuit is dismissed.

arrow