logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2021.01.08 2020가합101455
유류분반환
Text

1. Defendant E’s each of the Plaintiffs’ KRW 51,264,358 and each of the said money is 5% per annum from November 17, 2020 to January 8, 2021.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 30, 1951, the networkF married with Defendant C on March 30, 1951, set up the Plaintiffs, Defendant D, G, and H as their children.

The deceased F (hereinafter referred to as “the Deceased”) died on November 27, 2017.

B. Defendant E is the child of Defendant D with I and the deceased’s grandchildren.

(c)

On December 20, 2001, Defendant D completed the registration of the transfer of ownership on the ground of sale on December 12, 2001, with respect to J-si, Leecheon-si and 169 square meters in J-si, and 3,005 square meters in K (hereinafter “J-K land”).

(d)

On September 21, 2015, the Deceased donated 1/2 shares among the following: (a) Defendant C and E donated 248§³ and above-ground detached houses (hereinafter “L land and housing”); and (b) Defendant C and E completed the registration of transfer of ownership based on donations on September 22, 2015.

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap evidence 3-1, 2, 5, and 6-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion that the defendant C donated 1/2 of L and 1/2 of the housing to the deceased, which caused the violation of the plaintiffs' legal reserve of inheritance.

J and K land is the land on which the deceased entrusted the deceased's birth M in his name, and the defendant D was donated the above land from the deceased, and the 1/2 shares of the L land and the 1/2 shares of the housing that the defendant E received from the deceased were actually donated by the defendant D. Accordingly, each of the above donations infringed the plaintiffs' legal reserve of inheritance.

Therefore, Defendant C and D have a duty to return shortage to the plaintiffs.

If Defendant E, not Defendant D, is deemed to have received 1/2 shares of L and housing, Defendant C and E are obligated to return the shortage in legal reserve of inheritance to the Plaintiffs.

3. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. Article 1008 of the Civil Act provides, “If there is a person who received a gift or testamentary gift from an inheritee among co-inheritors, such gift or testamentary gift does not reach his/her share of inheritance, that shortage of property is insufficient.

arrow