beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 9, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of probation for larceny, etc. at the Busan District Court on May 17, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 17, 2013. On April 8, 2008, the same court was sentenced to a fine of one million won for larceny, etc. on April 10, 2008, and was sentenced to two years of probation for one year of imprisonment for larceny, etc. at the same court on April 10, 2008; on September 2, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for the same court on September 2, 2008; on December 13, 2010, the summary order of one million won for larceny was sentenced to a fine of two million won for larceny, etc. at the same court on March 14, 201, and was sentenced to a fine of two million won in the same court on May 18, 2011.
The defendant raised money in Busan Jin-gu, Busan, the third floor clothing store in the E market in Busan, with a sense to steal the cash in the accounting team by using the gap in which the main people find a job.
On September 3, 2013, the Defendant, at around 12:04, stolen money and valuables worth KRW 4,750,000,00 from that time by the same method seven times in total, as indicated in the annexed crime list, as shown in the annexed crime list, as the Defendant habitually stolen money and valuables worth KRW 4,750,000,00, in total, from that time, she attempted to steals property over a single-time period, by putting the victim’s cash store operated by the Victim F, “G” store with the third floor 27,00 in the E market in the above address, as a customer.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made to F and H;
1. Each statement of I, J and K;
1. A report on investigation (as to the attachment ofCCTV photographs);
1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, references, investigation reports (a copy of judgment, etc.);
1. Habituality of the judgment: Application of the damp-style Act, in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, and the frequency of crimes as indicated in the judgment;