The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the defendant did not assault the victim, the judgment of the court below which found him guilty of the facts charged is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the court of the lower judgment based on the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant committed assault, such as taking the victim’s bath as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the lower court, taking bucks, cutting down the right buckbucks, cutting down the head, etc.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.

0 The victim stated very detailed and bruptly the circumstances and contents of the assault from the defendant from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, and the explanation of the situation is reasonable.

0 At the time of violence, he/she was employed as an employee at the “D” house in which the violence occurred

F also, the defendant had directly seen the assault of the victim and reported to the investigation agency at the victim's request.

statement is generally consistent with the statement of the victim.

0 Unlike 0, the victim and witness are making a false statement in order to identify the defendant.

8.6.6.66.

0 After the instant case, the Defendant sent letters of apology and agreement to the victim.

3. Accordingly, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.