Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 4, 2019, around 20:50, the Defendant: (a) destroyed and damaged the victim’s damage by Myeon Office (hereinafter “C”); (b) under the influence of alcohol, 2 of the victim’s rapid plastic chairs were removed from the market price, without any particular reason; and (c) destroyed and damaged the victim’s re-explosing the market price, where the difference between the victim’s back in the Myeon Office (hereinafter “C”); and (d) the victim’s back in the Myeon Office (hereinafter “C”), without any particular reason.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property as above.

2. The Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol to ask questions about the Defendant’s personal information from Hongcheon Police Station 2 patrol Team G, the Hongcheon Police Station 112 reported that the Defendant avoided disturbance as above at the date, time, place, and place specified in paragraph (1) of the same Article; (b) took a bath to the above G while taking a bath to the said G; and (c) displayed the police officer’s face to the face.

Ultimately, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties regarding the handling of 112 reports as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. A H statement;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the field photographs of the case, 112 report handling table, internal investigation reports (related to the submission of victim D and H agreements), and each written agreement;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which shows an attitude that the defendant recognized all of his/her criminal acts, and expressed an attitude that he/she seems to reflect, has no record of crime, has agreed with the victim of the damage to property, and the degree of damage suffered by the victim police officers seems to be relatively minor, and the age, character, character, environment and crime of the defendant are committed.