logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.04.24 2014고정68
산업안전보건법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine, 50,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B A stock company is a company that is established for the purpose of reinforced concrete construction business, etc. and carries out the construction of Gangseo-gu Busan E house upon receiving an order from D. Defendant A is the representative director of the corporation B, and F is a person who has received sewage from B to connect the roof flag among the construction of the above house.

1. In case of a business which contracts and contracts separately part of Defendant A’s business, measures shall be taken to prevent industrial accidents which may occur when workers employed by the contractor work at the same place;

Nevertheless, Defendant A is a place with a height of at least 2,00 in which workers are in danger of falling, and where there is a danger of falling, Defendant A has to install safety belts in the light of the nature of the work. However, in the event that it is difficult to install safety belts due to the nature of the work, Defendant A is obliged to use safety belts, and even if the work advertising materials are required to be connected or fixed to at least two support materials so that it does not fall down, Defendant A, the contractor, and the victim G used by F, has not set up safety belts or safety belts without installing safety belts.

Accordingly, around 12:00 on February 21, 2012, the victim G, who had been growing to the rooftops for the purpose of connecting the rooftops in the work plate located in the height of the 2nd project site located in the height of the 2nd project site of the above construction site, fells into the floor in which the work launch plate during the work is shaking, and suffered multiple pressure pressures for about 12 weeks in which approximately 12 weeks of treatment is required.

Accordingly, the Defendant did not take measures to prevent industrial accidents that may arise when his workers employed by the contractor work while conducting a business by separating part of the business from the contract.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. is the representative of Defendant B Co., Ltd.

arrow