logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.12.12 2011고합103
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

No. 1, 2, and 3-B of the judgment of the defendant.

In the case of crimes, crimes of Articles 4 through 7, five years of imprisonment, and the decision No. 3 of the Court.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2011Gohap103] The Defendant received money from another person under the pretext of having another person receive money for the use of the title, such as the President of the Korea Buddhist Shelf, Director of the Korea Buddhist Private Teaching Team, Director of the Korea Buddhist Private Teaching Team, Director of the Police Newspapers, Director of the Korean National Assembly, Director of the Korean Peninsula newspaper, Director of the Korean Peninsula newspaper, and Director of the Korean Honorary Police Agency, as if he had friendship with the government's senior executives, or converting the donations paid by the believers into project expenses.

1. On April 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D through C, stating, “In the event that there is a donation of KRW 70 billion paid by the believers of the Korea Buddhist Shelf, and the donation is deducted under the project cost, the Defendant may receive a deduction of KRW 70 billion from the National Tax Service and the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service without paying 33% of the amount of tax to be paid to him/her, and the donation may be deducted from the donation amount.”

In fact, there was no intention or ability to convert the donations paid by the defendant to the project cost by the National Tax Service, etc.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 26,00,000 from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of his/her father E in the name of his/her father as the rain funds, and received KRW 30 million in total from the victim on April 28, 2010, and KRW 7 million on April 30, 2010, respectively.

2. On May 2010, the Defendant: (a) made the victim I at the Hannam-si, Hannam-si, Gyeonggi-do Hannam-si, G Hannam-si, such as the H’s coffee shop, and the middle-west Highway Down Down Down-si, “I will be allowed to execute the inspection work 30 billion goods ordered at the Down Down Down Down Down-si; (b) it should first be prior to this construction; (c) in order to cancel the seizure with the National Tax Service’s seizure being made by the National Tax Service, the Defendant should pay to the employees of the National Tax Service for the expenses incurred by the seizure and construction, and (d) KRW 100 million rights and KRW 50 million rights.

arrow