logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.01.28 2015고단1930
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant received, on July 9, 2013, a summary order of a fine of three million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Seo-gu District Court’s Seo-Support on the following grounds: (a) a summary order of a fine of seven million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act; (b) a fine of seven million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the same court on December 30, 2013; and (c) a summary order of five million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the same court on March 9, 2015.

[Criminal Facts]

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Drinking Driving), and Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Dless Driving) by the Defendant was a person engaging in driving of E-Poter cargo vehicles, and the said vehicle was driven under the influence of at least 0.154% of alcohol during blood, without obtaining a driver’s license on October 22, 2015, and was driven under the influence of at least 0.20:30 on October 22, 2015, and was driven under the influence of at least 0.154% of alcohol during blood while driving the said vehicle to be driven under the influence of at

At the time, it was difficult at night, and the Defendant’s front side of the vehicle, while the Victim F(44) was driving G SP car at the victim’s G SP car. In such a case, there was a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving service would not drive a vehicle under the influence of alcohol without a driver’s license, and that a person engaged in driving service would not drive a vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and that a person engaged in driving service would not drive a vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and that he would operate

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the victim’s back part of the victim’s vehicle as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc., which requires two-day medical treatment, and driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol once or more, even though he had a record of punishment for driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

2. A person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act shall not operate a motor vehicle on a road without mandatory insurance, but the defendant shall buy a mandatory insurance policy with the date and time specified in paragraph 1 above.

arrow