1. The Defendant’s KRW 48,151,080 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 20% per annum from August 10, 2015 to September 30, 2015.

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

[Reasons for Recognition] The entry of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 7 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The defendant's assertion argues that the plaintiff's purchase of the product of this case equivalent to USD 2,291,889 in 2015, but failed to comply with the plaintiff's claim since the plaintiff decided to purchase the product of this case, it is impossible to comply with the plaintiff's claim.

According to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 4, the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to terminate their mutual obligations and rights with respect to the mutual obligations and rights with respect to the total sales contract as of February 4, 2015, since the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to terminate the mutual obligations and rights with respect to the trade of at least 10,000 feet or US currency 1,000,000,000 won in the first year, the defendant's assertion is without merit.