logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.06.08 2018고단944
의료법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

No person other than a medical person shall perform medical practice, and no medical person shall perform any medical practice other than that licensed.

The Defendant, even though he is not an oriental medical doctor, is not a medical doctor, in the “C church” set up in B of the window of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, on March 5, 2017, and D, a believers, is not well extinguishing.

In addition, from around that time to July 28, 2017, medical practice was performed four times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form, including setting up a manual prepared in advance on the right hand of D, the right hand of D, etc. after being engaged in beer and beer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. Application of statutes on records of seizure and lists of seizure;

1. Article 87 (1) 2 of the Medical Service Act and Article 27 (1) of the same Act (or selection of imprisonment with labor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1) of the Confiscation Criminal Act include: (a) the Defendant’s perception of and reflects the Defendant’s mistake in depth; (b) the motive and background leading up to each of the instant crimes, including the frequency of the instant crimes; and (c) the method and result of each of the instant crimes, including the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, intelligence, environment, and other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, were comprehensively considered.

arrow