The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the defendant confessions and reflects the gist of the grounds for appeal, that the defendant does not repeat again after disposing of the vehicle, and that the village resident who helps the defendant to work for the farming company wanting to find the defendant's preference, the punishment (six months of imprisonment) sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, the drinking driving is a crime that may cause damage to the lives and property of individuals as well as other unspecified persons and needs to be strictly punished by reflecting the purpose of the revision of the Road Traffic Act. In the past, the Defendant has a history of having been punished several times due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (one time of suspended sentence of imprisonment and four times of fines) or a violation of the Road Traffic Act (one time of suspended sentence of imprisonment) in the past, and in particular, on April 9, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence for four months as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (one time of suspended sentence of imprisonment and four times of fines) from the Changwon District Court's Jinju Branch branch on April 9, 201, which became final and conclusive on April 17, 2014, and is still under suspended sentence, and as such, two months have not passed since the date of suspended sentence, other Defendant's character and conduct and environment, the background and consequence of the instant crime, and circumstances after the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.