All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a vehicle B in which the Defendant is driving.

On May 2, 2014, the Defendant driven a vehicle that he had to work as a manager of around 14:40, and came to enter the first line on the front side of the Manosung Motor Vehicle Service Center in the Magro-Seoul Metropolitan City, Daegu-gu.

At this point, if the road of the first line along which the median line is installed and the road is cross-sectioned into the road, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to temporarily stop prior to entering the road to ensure safety by checking the left and right well, and to prevent the traffic accident by entering the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and entered the road as it is.

The victim D(n, 59 years old) driving Epicers of Epicers and even parts of Epicers of the motor vehicle was driven by the defendant in front of the driving of the motor vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim D’s occupational negligence by the following: (a) the Defendant’s kneep and tension in the field of the shoulder knife of the dog knife which requires a stability and progress observation for about three weeks; (b) the knife of the knife knife and the knife part of the knife knife; (c) the knife part of the knife knife knife, the knife knife and the knife part of the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife k

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and public prosecution may be instituted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act