A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 24, 2010, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on March 3, 2014, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 as a fine for the same crime, etc.

On September 1, 2016, at around 23:34, the Defendant driven a B Lart car owned by the Defendant in the state of alcohol alcohol content of about 8km from the parking lot of the indoor swimming pool in the trade name in the northwest of South-west, South-west, South-west, South-west, to the shore at the entrance of a water village at the same tri-dong, e.g., from approximately 8km to the shore at the entrance of a water village.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstances of a drinking driver, notification on the results of the control of drinking driving, and inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous for judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (attached to the previous records and summary order);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, even though the defendant had been subject to punishment three times due to drinking driving, the defendant committed the crime of this case, and that drinking water is considerable, the criminal liability of the defendant is not easy. However, the fact that the defendant reflects his/her criminal act, the fact that the defendant has no penal power other than the fine, etc., other than the defendant's age and character, are considered favorable to the defendant, and the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of various sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case including the defendant's age