Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

From July 2005, the Defendant served as the head of the branch office of the Daejeon Daejeon Chungcheongnamnam Branch from the third floor of the Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon building, and was engaged in the business of keeping and executing the said D funds.

1. Around May 2008, the Defendant: (a) deposited KRW 12,070,000, which is 12,070,000, which is the remaining money as interest for the construction cost of the E-building; (b) had been kept for business purposes for the said D branch by the method of repeatedly setting time deposits in the name of one year in the name of the relevant branch of the D Daejeon Chungcheongnam-gu Daejeon Daejeon District Association; (c) on December 9, 201, the Defendant withdrawn KRW 12,769,250, including interest, from the post office deposit deposit (Account NumberF) that was subscribed at the time of Daejeon Viewing post office and embezzled

2. On November 2, 2012, the Defendant: (a) withdrawn KRW 300,000 from the Fund deposited in the Agricultural Cooperative (G) account in the name of the said branch; and (b) embezzled KRW 200,000, out of the same day as the H expense support held in the D Mountainous District Association; and (c) used it for personal use on the same day.

3. Around January 8, 2014, the Defendant withdrawn KRW 100,00 from the Fund’s name of bottled expenses from the branch’s fund deposited in the agricultural cooperative account as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (2) with the name of the branch’s member I, and embezzled it using his personal intent at that time while keeping it for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to J

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 356 and 355 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order return all the amount embezzled by the defendant and the fact that there is no criminal records of the same kind of crime shall be determined as ordered by the order; and