logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.11.23 2018나53403
기타(금전)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the reasoning of this court’s explanation is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except where “Plaintiff and I” is deemed to be “Plaintiff and D,” under Section 7, Section 16, of the judgment of the first instance; and (b) such reasoning is as it is, in accordance with the main sentence of Article

(A) The Plaintiff filed an application with F as a witness to verify that he/she delivered his/her opinion to F, who is the head of the Defendant’s business headquarters, in relation to his/her taking office as a C director, and F, the witness of the Party F, who was the witness of the Party F, did not have consulted with the Plaintiff before taking office as C, and rather, he/she instructed the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff was registered as C’s director through H agency on July 2016, which constitutes grounds for dismissal, and the Plaintiff testified that the Plaintiff retired from C’s office upon receiving such warning).

arrow