logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(춘천) 2019.08.26 2019누120
진료계획 불승인처분 취소청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the following is cited or added. Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second and second written judgment of the first instance court "No. 2" shall be raised as "No. 2 and No. 4" in the second written judgment of the first instance.

The fifth part of the first instance judgment’s “insufficiently insufficient” in the fifth 20th part of the first instance judgment is considered as “In light of the above circumstances, the treatment of the Plaintiff is merely a treatment to prevent the aggravation of the fixed symptoms, although the Plaintiff’s symptoms have already been fixed, and it constitutes a ground for the termination of treatment (see Supreme Court Decision 2017Du36618, Jun. 19, 2017).”

2. Conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow