beta
Text
1. The defendant's compulsory execution against the plaintiff is based on the payment order of the Gwangju District Court 2004 tea6551.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On February 18, 199, the bankruptcy trustee of the Dong Bank Mutual Savings and Finance Company (hereinafter “Dong Bank Mutual and Finance Company”) asserted that “Dong Bank Mutual and Finance Company lent KRW 200 million to the Plaintiff under joint and several sureties’s joint and several sureties on February 18, 199 (hereinafter “instant loan” or “instant loan”), and filed an application for payment order on loans against the Plaintiff and B with the Gwangju District Court, as the Gwangju District Court 2004Hu6551.
B. On September 3, 2004, the above court issued a payment order (hereinafter "the instant payment order") to the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation jointly and severally with the plaintiff and B, for KRW 228,42,549 and for KRW 200,000,000,000, which was calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from June 30, 200 to the date of full payment. The payment order was served on September 13, 2004 for the plaintiff and became final and conclusive on September 28, 2004, and served on October 25, 2004 for B and became final and conclusive on November 9, 204.
C. On June 29, 2001, after the date of the instant loan, Dong Bank Mutual Savings and Finance Company was declared bankrupt by the Gwangju District Court and the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation was appointed as a trustee in bankruptcy.
On December 16, 2008, the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation transferred the instant loan claims to the Defendant (Seoul Bank Co., Ltd.) on December 16, 2008, and notified the Plaintiff of the transfer.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without a partial dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1, purport of the whole pleadings
2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment as to the cause of the claim
A. The plaintiff's assertion is related to the loan of this case by forging the loan certificate, loan receipt, and proxy (the plaintiff's name and address stated in the above document Nos. 2 and 3, and each document is not the plaintiff's pen, but the stamp image is not the seal of the plaintiff) under the name of the plaintiff, although there was no fact that the loan was made by the Dong bank mutual savings and finance company on February 18, 199.